A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, request to make their relatives household. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such parts are subject matter to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, specially within a delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, that's partially crafted, is in the correct situation. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal scheduling disputes, in which views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary efforts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic in the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment within the legal timeline.
In the Main of the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as produced, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of setting up paperwork, maps, and situations attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is determined by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting in its place that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically trying to make a family property in accordance With all the law. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Region of Conservation and say that each one works are already performed according to Specialist information and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and Rene Collier and Paul Feely René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality on the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and arranging problems. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who should Reside alongside one another very long once the authorized expenses happen to be paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of your dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Whether it is going to in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.